James Johnson
Registered
For the past two years I have used View/Footer to number pages of documents, with no problems. For example Page 1 of 3, Page 2 of 3, Pages 3 of 3.
Recently, however, I find it PRINTS Page 1 of 1, Page 2 of ", Page 3 of £ even though it appears on SCREEN correctly.
At first I thought I had clicked on "Insert Page Number" twice instead of "Insert Page Number" then "Insert Number of Pages".
Originally, I used the CD-ROM to install the application. Recently I updated the version to 11.2.5. and then later to 11.2.6. I now have 11.3.5 I cannot tell if the problem arose subsequently, but I can say it was definitely correct originally.
Is there a bug in the update, or am I doing something wrong elsewhere?
I have uninstalled the application and the preference file, and then reinstalled the application with the latest update 11.3.5. I also ran Disk Utility/Repair Preferences. But no go. I have also been in touch with support at Brother regarding my two printers - Brother Laser HL5150D, and MFC 410CN. Sometimes it works correctly on one printer and not the other, and vice-0versa. There seems no rhyme or reason for it.
James Johnson
Recently, however, I find it PRINTS Page 1 of 1, Page 2 of ", Page 3 of £ even though it appears on SCREEN correctly.
At first I thought I had clicked on "Insert Page Number" twice instead of "Insert Page Number" then "Insert Number of Pages".
Originally, I used the CD-ROM to install the application. Recently I updated the version to 11.2.5. and then later to 11.2.6. I now have 11.3.5 I cannot tell if the problem arose subsequently, but I can say it was definitely correct originally.
Is there a bug in the update, or am I doing something wrong elsewhere?
I have uninstalled the application and the preference file, and then reinstalled the application with the latest update 11.3.5. I also ran Disk Utility/Repair Preferences. But no go. I have also been in touch with support at Brother regarding my two printers - Brother Laser HL5150D, and MFC 410CN. Sometimes it works correctly on one printer and not the other, and vice-0versa. There seems no rhyme or reason for it.
James Johnson