QT licensing

QT Pro licensing. Do you think Apple

  • should charge more for the Pro version

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • is doing just right

    Votes: 4 23.5%

  • should charge less

    Votes: 5 29.4%

  • should extend the validity/lifetime of the Pro key

    Votes: 6 35.3%

  • should make it "pay once for all time"

    Votes: 6 35.3%
  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .
Dekatophil

Dekatophil

Registered
QT 6 is out and again our Pro keys are worth zero. Now, Apple wants me to buy the third Pro key in 3 years. Personally, I think that's a bit much. I'm a private user but like Pro features like
full-screen display video exporting etc...

What do y'all think, is Apple charging too much/too often ?

(Note that you can select more than one answer in the above poll)
 
QuickTime is, by far, in my opinion, the BEST multimedia solution offered today. I do not think $30 is asking too much for this technology -- look at Sorenson -- they charge an upwards of a few hundred dollars for their compression codecs and software. QuickTime now has MPEG4, which should be amazing, and they're charging us $30 for it. Peanuts.

I just bought a QuickTime Pro 5 license about 2 months ago, and now I have to pay again. Needless to say, I was a little disappointed, but still did not hesitate in the least to purchase the new license.

And damn it feels good to be licensed.
 
It would be nice if it were GNU but...that'll never happen.

I agree with ElDiabloConCaca, but I'd charge less since I'm Canadian and our dollar is worth as much as your old Pro key :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top