Safari 1.3: Only ready when Tiger is?

fryke

fryke

Moderator
Staff member
Mod
Apparently, Safari 1.3 is developed alongside Safari 2.0 (Tiger), according to new information. DP5 of Safari 1.3 (v168) has been seeded to developers, containing this information. Apparently, Safari 1.3 takes the advantages of 2.0's webkit - without 2.0's featureset. So to all those who were hoping for a new Safari release soon: Apple's apparently holding off of that until Tiger's released. Then, Panther users will be able to update to version 1.3, which has the same basic site compatibility, but none of the features like family controls or RSS that make 2.0 quite an upgrade.
 
Ah, good info, my man... been wanting to hear something good about Safari 1.3, but I'll probably get my hands on Tiger the day it comes out so I'll be on 2.0 anyway. Ah, well, good for those who hold off on upgrading immediately.
 
You know, there are words beside "apparently" that could be used. Also you didn't need the second 'apparently' because it seems like you are going on to another topic. Otherwise, good sentence structure.
 
fryke said:
Apparently, Safari 1.3 is developed alongside Safari 2.0 (Tiger), according to new information. DP5 of Safari 1.3 (v168) has been seeded to developers, containing this information. Apparently, Safari 1.3 takes the advantages of 2.0's webkit - without 2.0's featureset. So to all those who were hoping for a new Safari release soon: Apple's apparently holding off of that until Tiger's released. Then, Panther users will be able to update to version 1.3, which has the same basic site compatibility, but none of the features like family controls or RSS that make 2.0 quite an upgrade.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info Fryke, i have been wondering about this for some time. BTW, your site is awesome. Today was the first time i went to it.

ApeintheShell said:
You know, there are words beside "apparently" that could be used. Also you didn't need the second 'apparently' because it seems like you are going on to another topic. Otherwise, good sentence structure.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
ApeintheShell said:
You know, there are words beside "apparently" that could be used. Also you didn't need the second 'apparently' because it seems like you are going on to another topic. Otherwise, good sentence structure.
Click to expand...

ahhaahahhahaa.....


APPARENTLY, we do have people from all around the world in here. So you will have to excuse our grammar and spelling mistakes.
But apparently, its a good thing that you pointed it out so we dont make the same mistakes in the apparent future!!!
 
Apparently, I seem to be a fan of that word. ;) Actually (another one!) I guess I've heard it a _little_ too much by 'Susan' from the hilarious comedy series 'Coupling' on the BBC. But I'm glad that the _info_ was still 'good enough'.
 
soulseek...it's unnecessary is all it is and has nothing to do with coming from different countries. You make me ::sleepy:: ya know?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top