yep. hopefully it won't be too crashy.Originally posted by jdennison
yes, enlightenment would rock muchly..
hopefully, once GTK is ported over to OSX, stuff such as enlightenment shall follow....
THAT WOULD ROCK MUCHLY..
and suchly
hehehehehehehehehhh
I don\'t think you understand much about GTK or window managers.Originally posted by jdennison
yes, enlightenment would rock muchly..
hopefully, once GTK is ported over to OSX, stuff such as enlightenment shall follow....
THAT WOULD ROCK MUCHLY..
and suchly
hehehehehehehehehhh
No. To port X windows apps you need to run an X server. Once you have that you can run GTK apps.Originally posted by clark
I think its important to port gtk to macos x. Becuase then x windows apps can be ported. Gimp is a app I love to see running on macosx. gtk is ported to classic and needs to be carbonized to run on osx. check out http://www.macgimp.com.
.
Maybe logan is using a beta of the beta LOLOriginally posted by Agnt_Mulder
Oh, by the way; the reason I wasn\\\'t sure if that scheme was an OS X overlay or just a K-scheme, is that in a recent episode Logan entered something that caused a menu or a dialog box to roll out from one of the windows, OS X style. Has someone ported Kaleidoscope to X?
Why is Apple being so retentive about schemes for OS x.. I can understand why schemes mimicing their hard work and graphics in producing X, but they have to ealize that unless they put some kind of neat new customization feature into OS X (like Kaleidoscope) people are going to do it on their own anyway. Why not be more user-friendly?![]()