I almost wish that Apple hadn't brought G4 into all their computers, besides the iBook.
Think about it this way. With the current sales trends of major PC manufacturers and the rumors of the G3 becoming supercharged and Altivec capable, having 3 chip lines would be great!
I would think that the eMac would be $200 less or so with a G3 in it, instead of G4, wouldn't you?
G3 -> eMac, iBook, new small form factor tower.
G4 -> iMac, 12" PB, 15"PB, Dual 17" PB, XServe 1U, new small form factor tower.
G5 -> PowerMac, PB 15" (high end), PB 17", XServe 2U.
That would give the consumer many more options and pricing scales.
Apple could really use more than 1 line of desktop equipment. Think about this:
1.2GHz G3, 256MB PC133, 40GB HD, 10/100, GeForce 3/4MX type with 32MB, small form factor: $799.99
1.5GHz G4, 256MB DDR, 60GB HD, Gigabit, GeForce 4MX 32MB, small form factor: $1199.99
1.6GHz G5: $1599.99
People can pick their own display to fit their needs/space. There'd also be a more entry level line available for the people that want towers, never had an Apple, and don't want to spend $1600.00 to try one out.
The laptops could use 3 chips to accomplish the same thing. With a high end 15" and 17" having the G5 option and the 17" also having a dual G4 configuration.
Have any of you really looked at what comes in these $499.99 Dells? Not much, IMO. Apple's $799.99 desktop response may be a good push. It'll also create more attention to the eMac with it's simular specs and built in monitor.
Just a thought.
As far as respect goes, I don't think they do...yet. So many people are blind to Apple. I was talking to someone today who wants an iPod for their PC desperately and didn't think Apple.com would sell them. They weren't even 100% sure Apple made the product.
Over 1 million sold and some still don't make the connection.
I agree that things are turning around, especially with the computational cluster at VT and the Schaumburg iBook purchase. G5 was the beginning and Panther should sway many more to the platform.