Mac OS X 10.4.10 in development

[fryke]

There's not that much information yet, but I guess the main thing for most on forums like this one will be the numbering scheme. ... There are articles on MacRumors, AppleInsider and macnews.net.tc - and today, ThinkSecret has also weighed in on it: http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0705macosx10410.html ...

I for one am glad that Apple's doing this.

 

[jasfa131]

Cool! Will this be an alternative to buying Leopard?

 

[nixgeek]

And here we thought this wouldn't materialize...

 

[fryke]

Cool! Will this be an alternative to buying Leopard?

Well, no. It'll just be a bugfix update to Tiger. Just like 10.4.9 was. Of course you _can_ stay off Leopard and use 10.4.9 or 10.4.10, but it's not intended as an alternative or anything.

 

[jcooke]

I usally wait till they release 10.x.1 of anything because, it always seems that theres a small bug that kills me.

 

[Ferdinand]

I'm going to stick to Tiger at the moment and first check if my router, HP all-in-one printer etc... accept Leopard. And if I'm really going to update, then only my MacBook because my iBook is already quite slow, and with Leopard... I don't even want to imagine.

 

[MacFreak]

For many years since 6.04 to 10.4.9. Never see .10 now, Therefore apple's first time to have 10.4.x its very strange to see this.

 

[fryke]

Back in the days of classic Mac OS, you _wouldn't_ have seen it. They would've gone from, say, 6.08 to 6.1, treating these numbers as decimals.

 

[jcooke]

Back then you would have to pay to go from 7.1 to 7.5.

 

[Rhisiart]

With full acknowledgements to Spinal Tap, I think 10.4.11 is going to be knockout!

 

[bbloke]

With full acknowledgements to Spinal Tap, I think 10.4.11 is going to be knockout!

Why not just make it go up to 10.4.10, and make .10 better than .11?

 

[Damrod]

As Leopard is still aalmost half a year away, I think it's a good thing that Apple brings another Update for Tiger. Thumbs up from me