Mac OS X targeted by Trojan and backdoor tool

Oh believe me, I am not calling anyone "stupid."

I would be the last one to brand another computer user as "stupid."

--J.D.
 
Some people should not own computers... especially those who refuse to own the responsibility.
I'm going to play the devil's advocate here.

Whatever one's morals about pornography, I think you'd have to be either addicted to porn or just plain daft to follow any instructions to download software from a porn site.

How long I wonder though before Trojans start appearing from non-porn sites, that might just catch out an average computer user? 'Just Say No' to every request for your administrator password may negate any pleasure or usefulness from using a computer.

I can drive a car safely and responsibly, fill it with fuel, check the oil and tyre pressures, but if anything needs repairing or maintaining I am lost. Does this mean I shouldn't be driving?
 
I can drive a car safely and responsibly, fill it with fuel, check the oil and tyre pressures, but if anything needs repairing or maintaining I am lost. Does this mean I shouldn't be driving?
Nope, it just means you shouldn't attempt to "maintain" or "repair" anything because you have the knowledge that you don't have enough knowledge in order to do those things.

I can screw a new faceplate onto my light switch without electrocuting myself. Could I install new, recessed lighting in my kitchen? Hell no, because I don't know how and I know I don't know how, so I would defer that to the professionals.

Same as on a computer:
WEBSITE: "You need to install this codec in order to view this Quicktime movie."

INTERNET USER: "What's a codec? I wasn't even trying to view a movie!"

WEBSITE: "Ok, download is done. Ready to install codec."

INTERNET USER: "Oh, ok. What a helpful thing this internet is! Here is my administrator password. Do what you please, installer!"
What should have happened in that situation is the user should have deferred installation of the "codec" to the professionals... or simply backed out of the site. It's when a user blindly proceeds forward without knowing what will happen next that they get themselves into trouble.

MacGuyver knows what will happen next when he cuts the red wire on the bomb... you, on the other hand, do not, and you will blow yourself up trying.

And just because they fall for it once doesn't mean they shouldn't be using a computer at all. But if they fall for it again, then you really have to question their common sense, or memory, or cognitive abilities, or something.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
 
ElDiabloConCaca, I see your point, but only to a point if you see what I mean. Your example makes sense, but I can still envisage a time in the near future when (maybe) what you are downloading is not only what you want (and I am not talking busty babes here) and furthermore, you have no reason to suspect anything amiss.
 
Very true, I understand your point.

I'm sure in the future we will see greater attempts to subvert the user into installing things that they did not request, or perhaps did request but the download is not what they were expecting.

It is for this reason exactly that I think users should take great interest in what Mac OS X does and how it works -- it would help them to perhaps catch an unwanted download ahead of time instead of after the fact... after their system has already been infected.

Just like a car -- sure, you can get by just knowing how to put the key in the ignition and work the pedals, but it would be a great advantage to know what's involved in an oil change and what's involved when a brake job is done (not necessarily how to do these procedures yourself, just knowing what is involved with them). Without knowing what's involved, it is extremely easy for repair shops to take advantage of the customer. For example, if people knew that an oil change simply involved draining the oil, replacing that oil with new oil, and putting a new filter on (a ~30 minute job at best), then they could raise a red flag in their head when some whack-job mechanic says, "Ooooh, changing the oil is a very involved procedure and is going to cost your $100." -- the customer could then say, "Look, buddy. I know what's involved when you change my oil and I know that when you say that you're trying to take advantage of my lack of knowledge."

Similar principles apply to computer and online activity.
 
Sophos--a free anti-virus recommended by a Mac Guru on ANOTHER FORUM [Boo. Hiss.--Ed.] detects it. I have not been able to determine whether or not ClamXAV does as well.

Now about that new Mac OS X Trojan

Over the last week there has been quite a bit of press about a new Mac OS X Trojan. Secure as it is, generally speaking, OSX is not bullet-proof, much to the despair of Mac enthusiasts like myself.

Symantec published detection for OSX.Lamzev.A on Nov 13th, 2008. Word of OSX.Lamzev.A circulated on the SecuriTeam blog on Nov 14th. Trend Micro’s blog reports this malware on Nov 17th, as does Intego’s entry on Nov 19th.

Just to clarify, Sophos had already published detection for this Trojan as Troj/RKOSX-A on 29th August, 2008.

--J.D.
 
Heh! Same Guru who recommended Sophos wrote a recommendation to watch iAntivirus a few days ago! :)

--J.D.
 
Okay. Who's this "iAntivirus" from and why's it free? ;) "PC Tools" I don't know (so I don't trust 'em).
Edit: Page says it's 49.99 CHF, so I guess it _ain't_ free.
 
That is the Super-Duper-Business-24-Hour Tech Support Contraceptives Supplied Version.

Why one would need it I do not know, unless one has a Mac that runs Parallels/Bootcamp and/or deals with PC files that they can pass to others.

--J.D.
 
I use BitDefender for Windows XP (using a VM). For Mac I use Intego's VirusBarrier (yes, I know I don't need it). Bitdefender seem to get good reviews. Not a bad deal for 30 Euro a year.

Intego have been quick to publicise the latest Trojan. It must be Manner from Heaven for them to have something to justify their product (albeit their time will come).
 
I don't want to buy VirusBarrier. And I don't necessarily want to promote it to my customers after I've sold them their Mac with the incentive of them not currently requiring antiviral software. So I'd rather know how to identify and remove the trojan by hand or with a free (free! not "free download, buy later"!) tool like DNSChangerRemoval. (I know, I'm too vocal, things will appear...)
 
. . . and the creator of the DNSChangerRemover hopes it will inspire you to purchase his malware remover that removes . . . well . . . okay, it does not actually remove anything currently.

To be fair, it takes a lot of time to maintain these things, and as you know, time often means money. It is nice that there are some willing to offer frequent updates out of the goodness of their hearts.

ClamXAV is utterly free. I simply do not know if it recognizes and removes these two particular "nasties." The iAntiVirus is also free.

It is well to question such products given the propensity for "viral scans" for PCs to report "vira" that then require "removal" which, of course, results in you having a very infected PC.

--J.D.
 
Indeed, and should you ever read their home page you will understand why I wrote the reply I wrote.

Take your time.

--J.D.
 
It may prove unreasonable for me to expect others to wait for him to do that which he suggests; therefore, others may find the following information from that page . . . enlightening in comparison to my previous post.

iAntiVirus.jpg


Quod erat demonstrandum.

--J.D.
 
Ah, I see. Sorry. Really Didn't read the thing exactly. So it's free for non-commercial use and without support.
 
Back
Top