Delivering Higher Performance: The e600 and e700 Cores and Platforms
The next planned step in Freescales performance roadmap is the e600 core and corresponding e600 platform. An enhanced version of the high-performance G4 core used in the award-winning, high-performance MPC74xx family of PowerPC host processors, the e600 core is planned to scale beyond 2 GHz and to support chip multiprocessing (CMP) while maintaining full compatibility with the PowerPC instruction set architecture. Like its G4 predecessor, the superscalar e600 core is designed to issue four instructions per clock cycle (three instructions plus one branch) into eleven independent execution units, and to include a full 128-bit implementation of Freescale's advanced AltiVec Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) vector processing technology.
Freescale Semiconductor also disclosed today at SNDF its plans to develop the next-generation 32/64-bit e700 PowerPC core and corresponding e700 platform. Processor products engineered around Freescales forthcoming e700 SoC platform are planned to be capable of running both 32-bit and 64-bit software and scaling to 3 GHz and beyond in next-generation process technologies.
kendall said:i may be wrong but i believe $1999 was the price of the previous 1.8GHz DP that is NOW crippled (no pci-X, only 4gb ram) for the oh so lovely price of $1999. so no my friend, IT IS NOT THE SAME and you are now paying MORE for LESS.
can i refill your glass of koolaid?
fryke said:*cough* 1.8 *cough*. (it was the 1.8 that was 2499, not the 1.6...)
Captain Code said:Yeah, doh. So 1799 for the 1.6 before, now 1999 for the dual 1.8
If you consider the 90nm construction and thus less heat and more silence for the fans, the $100 relativize moreIf you compare the new dual 2.0 GHz to the old dual 1.8 GHz, you'll see that the only change is the 10% faster processors and the SuperDrive. Is that even worth the extra $100?
Pengu said:This actually means, that a "previous" dual 1.8 is "better" than a current one? More memory. pci-x. they didnt add anything.
Cat said:Isn't there a new processor from Freescale/Motorola, the e600 or e700 which could be a good candidate for future PowerBooks?
That's what the rumour mill is saying. The point simply is: where will the *Books and the iMac go next for their processors? The G5 can't be done and overclocking older cores hits a limit somewhere. How long can they keep it up? They will need a new processor sooner or later. Well, Motorola will produce them sooner or later.Which brings us to the Freescale e600/e700 System-on-a-Chip architecture.
Ever since a copy of Motorola's roadmap for its new Freescale Semiconductor spin-off was uncovered by XLR8YourMac, speculation has been running rampant about the possibility of the e600/e700 all-in-one (CPU, system controller, PCI, USB, Firewire, etc) chips being used in future low-end, compact Macs such as the rumored headless "iMac Mini."
The advantages of System-on-a-Chip architectures are numerous and include lower overall system cost, improved performance, and reduced development time/cost for computer makers (in this case Apple). Freescale's implementation which uses an enhanced PowerPC 745x core (in the e600) or Motorola 32/64-bit Book E "G5" core (e700) does seem promising -- and sources at Freescale report they've been in talks with Apple ever since the spin-off announcement about ways the two parties could work together to redeem Motorola's PowerPC technology for the Mac.