texanpenguin
Registered Penguin
I don't normally care one way or the other about this sort of thing: nine times out of ten a copy-protected disc runs just fine in iTunes on Mac (unless the copy protection makes the disc unusual [a few years ago there was one which had to be circumvented with a permanent marker]).
But this is ridiculous, and I just need to rant. Sony has been whining for years about the problems they're experiencing financially. Their solution is to lock the paying customers out of the full use of their disc in a way that opens them up to attack from viruses and Trojans (technically it IS a Trojan itself). This solution costs a whole bunch of money, too, mind you. They've had to employ a DRM manufacturer to make this technology. Then, as if paying for the DRM support for PCs wasn't enough, they also commissioned the Kernel Extensions to OS X! THESE EXTENSIONS AREN'T INSTALLED UNTIL YOU RUN THE INSTALLER. What a waste of money.
If they want to stop file-sharing, make CDs cheaper, and better. If people can get good music for a reasonable price, they'll gladly pay for it: look at iTMS. And that's DRMed! If they sold CDs in stores for half the price they currently do, they'd sell a heck of a lot more units (but they're kidding themselves if they think people will stop pirating. Often it's a case of not being able to FIND the music you want, either because of cultural or proximity divisions, but the more people leave the File sharing networks, the less people are there sharing music, and therefore the less music there is there to share. When there ends up being like one person sharing the latest such-and-such album at 128kbps VBR MP3, who wants to sit there downloading 20 songs, if they can spend five minutes and get a full-quality CD version for a pittance?
But this is ridiculous, and I just need to rant. Sony has been whining for years about the problems they're experiencing financially. Their solution is to lock the paying customers out of the full use of their disc in a way that opens them up to attack from viruses and Trojans (technically it IS a Trojan itself). This solution costs a whole bunch of money, too, mind you. They've had to employ a DRM manufacturer to make this technology. Then, as if paying for the DRM support for PCs wasn't enough, they also commissioned the Kernel Extensions to OS X! THESE EXTENSIONS AREN'T INSTALLED UNTIL YOU RUN THE INSTALLER. What a waste of money.
If they want to stop file-sharing, make CDs cheaper, and better. If people can get good music for a reasonable price, they'll gladly pay for it: look at iTMS. And that's DRMed! If they sold CDs in stores for half the price they currently do, they'd sell a heck of a lot more units (but they're kidding themselves if they think people will stop pirating. Often it's a case of not being able to FIND the music you want, either because of cultural or proximity divisions, but the more people leave the File sharing networks, the less people are there sharing music, and therefore the less music there is there to share. When there ends up being like one person sharing the latest such-and-such album at 128kbps VBR MP3, who wants to sit there downloading 20 songs, if they can spend five minutes and get a full-quality CD version for a pittance?