Lt Major Burns said:10.3 was just clean effortless, simple, powerful, cool, and had little or no fault, that i can think of. 10.4 seemed like incomplete features for gimmicks sake.
adambyte said:lol... I PREFER to work on Mac OS X 10.4.... but I really DO have a soft spot for System 7.x .... very clean, while still having a good amount of features. I suppose it's only real downfall when compared with other "classic" Mac OS systems is that when you copy files, you can't multitask.
Giaguara said:hmmm ... running 10.4 and 10.3 both daily, os 9 sometimes, solaris for the fun of it, windows xp professional when needed, but i'm really looking to get something to have os 7 and os 8 in them ...
Giaguara said:Wow nixgeek I think I'll first make my other 1/2 first go thru all his old Macs, he might have somehwere e.g. a really old PowerBook or first ever iBook or something else that I could entertain myself with .. then if he finds nothing interesting, then I probably send a note ..
Why not switch to Adobe InDesign (he says half jokingly and half seriously)?CaptainQuark said:First impressions? Not bad, not bad, but a couple of things annoy me greatly:
1. Can't hide QuarkXPress using [Cmd]+[H]