I guess this is directed to manic, I was a former PC user converted to mac.. Looking back on my decision to change to mac I realise it consisted of a few things:
(a) I had tried every x86 operating system available to man
(b) I was tired of the crappy grey taskbar (or blue luna), and no LiteStep sucks
(c) OSX looked darn pretty in those public beta screenshots
I agree in some respect, PC hardware is great.. and it's cheap! You can customise it however you like, but if you are anything like myself I used to buy new pc components each week - if I added up the components over the time of ownership of a PC they would probably end up costing the same as a macintosh system and that's not taking into consideration the failing components which happened every now and then.
I also agree that apple charges a premium price for hardware, maybe this is because of applecare/warranty system...
I like the hardware in the g4 systems, but admittedly when comparing applications like internet explorer on my dual 500 g4 to a single 733mhz p3 the p3 system blows the g4 away.. However this can be attributed to poor programming I believe, Mozilla and OmniWeb are much faster applications than IE for OSX.
Having said this, if Apple dropped out of the proprietary hardware industry, decided to make Nice cases / x86 systems and ship OSX for x86 with each system at a nice price, I dare say the g4 would get the boot very quickly.
On the other hand, if Motorola/IBM pulled their finger out of their ass and developed some quicker chips for Apple, we wouldn't be arguing over which system is better.
For me, the choice of a mac over pc really boils down to one specific thing: OSX and unix.
Hope this helps you in some way Manic, both hardware systems do their job well, but personal preference has to be taken into consideration.